What our customers are telling us
The outcomes we’re seeing in live use tell a consistent story. The platform is reshaping how teams spend their day, where their attention goes, and how quickly they can move from a flagged lead to a defensible decision. The most measurable improvements have shown up in four areas:
- Investigator efficiency is up 10 to 15%, based on direct feedback from internal fraud team leads
- Lead logging time is down roughly 50%, from around 20 minutes to 10 minutes per lead, which adds up to about an hour saved per person each week
- AML Ops teams are saving around an hour a day per user, through quicker mailbox logging, ATM allocation, screen navigation, and outcome capture
- Search speed is significantly faster, particularly when retrieving and referencing older leads
- The platform has held 100% uptime since launch, with users describing it as responsive, reliable, and quick to load
Beyond the metrics, the feedback we hear most often is qualitative. Teams describe seamless multi-case navigation through a tabbed interface, a more intuitive visual layout, and growing confidence that the platform can flex into adjacent use cases like sanctions, KYC refresh, and people-function integration. Just as importantly, the move from local tools like Rebus to an enterprise-backed platform has improved reliability, auditability, and security posture in ways that matter to CISOs and regulators alike.
Who this is suited for
This solution is built for fincrime functions that have outgrown their current operating model and need to industrialize without starting over. If several of the following sound familiar, your team would benefit from this kind of transformation:
- You track fraud and financial crime across multiple systems, spreadsheets, or email threads
- Your case progression is inconsistent or slow, and you can’t always explain why
- You suspect you’re missing connections between people, claims, or policies
- Your teams would benefit from a single view of entities across the business
- You already run ServiceNow but lack a structured fraud investigation module
- You need stronger confidence that only the right people can access sensitive fraud data
The more of these that resonate, the more value there is in moving early.
Where this can go next
What we’ve described so far is a foundation, not a finished state. Once the operating model is in place and the data is flowing through a single system of record, the work becomes considerably easier to extend, and the next layer of value starts to appear quickly.
The most immediate evolution is AI-driven pattern recognition across entity relationships, which becomes possible the moment the data is unified. From there, cross-team fraud intelligence sharing inside the tool starts to break down the silos between fraud, compliance, and legal that have historically held insurers back. Automated assessments and next-best-action suggestions follow naturally, and so does deeper integration with KYC, claims, payments, and third-party screening tools.
The compounding effect matters here. Each capability added to the foundation makes the next one easier, faster, and cheaper to deliver. Over time, the fincrime function stops being a fixed cost that scales with case volume and starts behaving more like an intelligence capability that gets sharper with every investigation.
The fincrime threat landscape is exponential, and the defense models most insurers run today were never designed for it. We help insurers close that gap by unifying fincrime operations on ServiceNow and embedding AI exactly where it changes the economics of the work.