Case Study | Retail and CPG | AI and Data Engineering

Leading QSR reduces app error messages by 95%

How fixing unclear in-app errors drove measurable gains in retention, revenue, and user satisfaction.

Download as PDF 12th December, 2025
element
element

How a messaging fix became a revenue breakthrough

  • A global quick-service restaurant (QSR) brand operating in over 100 countries faced persistent mobile app friction from unclear, inconsistent error messaging.
  • Unclear in-app errors caused session abandonment, missed conversions, suboptimal revenue per exposure, and an inflated support team workload across global markets.
  • Brillio, building on a five-year partnership, deployed a data-driven monitoring framework that matched specific error messages to segmented user cohorts and quantified revenue loss.
  • Within 90 days, fallout rates dropped and revenue per message exposure rose. Within one year, generic error messages were reduced by 95%.

From silent friction to system-wide digital transformation

Challenge

Every mobile app has error messages. Most brands treat them as a technical necessity rather than a commercial variable. For one of the world’s most iconic QSR chains, operating in more than 100 countries, that assumption was quietly draining revenue.

The problem wasn’t dramatic. There was no outage, no viral complaint, no single moment of failure. What existed instead was a persistent pattern: users hitting unclear or poorly worded error messages during the ordering flow, losing confidence, and abandoning their sessions. The message might say something generic and unhelpful. The user, already hungry and in a hurry, would close the app rather than try again.

Multiply that across millions of mobile sessions in key global markets, and the cumulative impact becomes significant. Sessions were being lost. Revenue per message exposure remained below where it should have been. Support teams were fielding avoidable inquiries from users who didn’t understand what had gone wrong or how to fix it. And because message updates were tied to an eight-week engineering release cycle, even when the problem was identified, fixing it was slow.

The challenge required more than a copy refresh. It demanded a cross-functional framework that could identify which error messages caused the most financial damage, prioritize fixes by revenue impact, and deploy changes fast enough to matter. Achieving that required behavioral data, financial modeling, and a partner with the technical depth and organizational credibility to drive alignment across teams.

Solution

Our approach began with instrumentation. A comprehensive monitoring framework was implemented to track in-app error message performance across key global markets, generating weekly reports that surfaced message movement, volume spikes, and irregular patterns in real time. These reports became the diagnostic foundation, enabling rapid investigation into the root causes behind error surges rather than treating each spike as an isolated incident.

In parallel, a financial impact methodology was built. Specific error messages were matched to segmented user cohorts, and those users’ subsequent behavior was compared against a control group of similar customers. The comparison covered order frequency, purchase value, product category, and fulfillment method, producing a revenue loss estimate for each error type. This allowed the team to sequence fixes by commercial priority, not just by technical ease.

The operational constraint was tackled next. To escape the eight-week release cycle, a strings management tool was introduced, decoupling message updates from full development deployments. Copy edits, A/B tests, and tone adjustments could now be executed independently and in real time. This restored speed to the process and gave the team the autonomy to iterate quickly based on what the data showed.

Adjustments to message clarity and tone were made iteratively as results came in. Cross-functional alignment was maintained throughout, with stakeholders across product, engineering, customer experience, and operations kept in sync. The combination of data rigor, operational agility, and human-centered design produced measurable results faster than anticipated, with early performance signals appearing within the first 90 days of implementation.

Measurable results across retention, revenue, and operations

Outcomes

  • Generic in-app error messages were reduced by 95% within the first year, improving app performance and measurably increasing user satisfaction across global markets.
  • Revenue per message exposure increased significantly as clearer, more actionable messages reduced session abandonment and kept more users moving through the ordering flow.
  • Support team workload dropped measurably, with fewer avoidable inquiries reaching agents once users could understand and respond to error messages without outside help.
  • Active user retention improved in key markets and a measurable lift in conversions validated the broader business case for investing in error experience design.
Download as PDF

Early impact that proved the business case for UX investment

What began as a UX improvement initiative quickly demonstrated commercial value. The combination of real-time monitoring, cohort-level financial analysis, and agile message deployment created a repeatable model that teams could apply across regions and error categories as the program scaled.

Better In-app Messaging

95%

Reduction in generic in-app error messages achieved within the first year.

Forward-looking thoughts and compelling stories

Life Sciences

Case Study

  • Life Sciences

A redesign for seamless integration of domain-specific clinical trials

A redesign for seamless integration of domain-specific clinical trials Read more  

Case Study

  • Hi-Tech

AI Cuts 25% of Tech Giant’s Global Support Tickets

AI Cuts 25% of Tech Giant’s Global Support Tickets Read more  

You define the north star, We pave the digital path

Let's connect   
elements
elements